Jacqueline Wells
Professor Monique Williams
English 1A
13 September 2013
Degrees
in Debt
With living costs
on the rise and a fixed minimum wage, it is no secret that the nation’s middle
class is shrinking. This rapidly closing economic fissure is magnified by the
swelling debt amassed by students forced to accrue student loans in the name of
higher education. Paradoxically, the great achievement of formally recognized
intellectual conquest is hindering scholars from proceeding to the subsequent
financial life stages post-graduation; these stages, all of which necessitate
good or decent credit, include purchasing a car or home, getting married, and supporting
their families. With national employment still catching up to the pace of
graduating young professionals, these newly-grads continue to struggle under
the pressure of securing steady employment so that they may begin to repay their
astronomical debt. It is unfeasible to demand an immediate change; what must
change is the way that future students and their families prepare for college,
in the form of devising a realistic, malleable plan, saving, and budgeting.
Every fledgling
couple dreams of sending their children off to college to become doctors, or
scientists, or astronauts. The sticker prices for the education necessary to these
professions are generally out of said couple’s immediate budget. It is common
for many parents to start a “college fund” in the early years of their youngster’s
life, with the intent to have enough saved by the time the child is old enough
to put the account to use. This tactic is good; however there are variables
that could lead to this plan to go awry. This may include unforeseen expenditures
that require “dipping” into the fund, which is of course done cautiously and
with every intention of being replaced. Companies such as The Gerber College
Plan and Upromise are reputable resources that assist young families saving for
school.
College is the
pathway to success, but to find the path, one must know how to look. Middle
class families are still at a far greater advantage than the lower class,
insofar as they have a general focus of moving forward and up rather than
surviving. This allows for a greater perspective and competence of financial
status, and a family may determine how
and when their young people will
attend college, rather than if. This
is most applicable to the nuclear family of the 21st Century, where
both partners work as equal heads of the household, while the stereotypical two
children attend school. Whereas before, students would apply to four-year
universities straight out of high school, a family could save roughly a third
of that bill by instead having their children attend junior colleges to receive
their general education. Junior colleges also allow for part-time work for
students, who typically live at home and enjoy little responsibility. Part-time
work benefits the student in two ways: it can help a student save money to
transfer to a four-year school, and it gives the student employment credibility
when they search for a job after they have obtained their degree.
As it is not
uncommon for college students to switch majors throughout their academic
careers, attending a junior college would also assist students in developing
their own passions, thereby making good use of the time spent at a university.
This is where the budget-plan malleability gains its relevance. If a student
decides to become of a doctor instead of a dentist, the cost of education will
easily double. If a family has not accounted for this change, they or their
child may leave themselves vulnerable to decades of indentured servitude to the
student-loan system. However, if parents can anticipate change and manage to over-shoot
their budget, this may soften or eliminate the fiscal blow.
No comments:
Post a Comment